blog

TACWeb Redesign Part 6 - Content

Comments (8) · 30 July 2005 · permalink

Post this to: del.icio.us · Twitter · email

Categories: Church Web Sites, TACWeb,

Content is obviously important on any web-site, so how can we ensure the content of a church site is kept up-to-date?

On the current site, one way to keep the appearance of an active site, is to regularly update the front-page. This works well, but as you look at some of the static pages (e.g. under Ministries) you will find some out-of-date content, or at least not very well written.

Basically, the static content on the current site was put together a number of years ago, and is only updated when factual information changes (e.g. a meeting time).

Further, some sections of the site which should be important, really lack any good content (e.g. the Jesus & You section).

Lumping this job on one person, will just not work, so I’ve been thinking about a strategy to get more people involved with the editing process.

So, with the next site I would like to have “content editors” and “sub-editors”. I don’t know if those names make sense, but I see the jobs as:

  • 2 Content Editors – These people would receive all site updates, and after editing (particularly to remove jargon and check for/improve readability) they would have sufficient access to update the site. They would also review the current pages of general information (e.g. About Us) and make them more readable/interesting/user-friendly.
  • Sub-Editors – These people would take ownership of particular pieces of content on the site. For example, someone involved in Children’s ministry would take responsibility for content relating to Children’s activities on the site. The sub-editor positions would be opened up to anyone at the Church, although access to email would make things easier for the Content Editors.

Initially, there would be a little bit of work to up-date the current content, but in the long-term the work would be minimal.

A third position(s) would be for some people to re-write the Christianity pages (or whatever they will be called). The Content Editors might find other sections that need an entire overhaul.

What do you think? Is this a workable strategy? Do you think people will get involved?

Next step: send an email around to people in the church seeking their involvement.

From the continuing series about the redesign of the Toongabbie Anglican Church web-site.

Gravatar for Neil
Permlink
1 ·
Comment by
Neil ·
Date Stamp
Saturday 30 July, 2005 at 07:39 AM

A fine idea… Is it workable? I would hope so!

It’s a good way to develop a deeper awareness of how various ministries work and fit in to the bigger picture.

How do you see the whole blogging thing fitting into this? Is the plan to have a blog aggregator page with feeds from the various church-people blogs?

FWIW, I’d be happy to volunteer as a content editor, if no one else puts their hand up…

 
Gravatar for Pete
Permlink
2 ·
Comment by
Pete ·
Date Stamp
Saturday 30 July, 2005 at 10:22 AM

I like the idea of sub-editors and content authors. I’ve often thought it a good idea for large sites.

Using something like TxP or similar should overcome the issues of unfamiliarity with HTML, which could previously impede the distribution of content editing tasks. For example, Mum is now posting updates on Neals on Wheels

 
Gravatar for Scott
Permlink
3 ·
Comment by
Scott ·
Date Stamp
Sunday 31 July, 2005 at 09:15 AM

While a delegation system is great to reduce the load of the webmaster, I also found it can be difficult to keep everyone continuously interested in updating their responsible area. When people heard that the church has a website, and they can contribute to it, everyone got a bit hyped up. After a few months, when people realised that it was actually “work”, updates got less frequent, and then fianlly stopped, left the main webmaster there trying to hold the website together.

So I am interested to know how to motivate all sub-editors (many not from computer background) to be responsible keeping their area up to date. It can be hard in a church context. Many clergies have little idea about Intenet and its effect (thou they kept on hearing cases where people found us via Google). We are also in a high turn-over church (lots of people leaving/coming), so people don’t have an idea about ownership, even just a few pages on the website.

Any tips?

 
Gravatar for Simon
Permlink
4 ·
Comment by
Simon ·
Date Stamp
Sunday 31 July, 2005 at 11:32 AM

Neil: the Church blog would be much like the content of the Online Features, Mission Blog and Weekly Blurb. So, purposeful posts about the life of our Church. The blog would be separate to the content editing which I talk of above.

Having said that, we would probably open the doors a bit more to the Church blog – much like Opinionated, with multiple authors.

The page aggregating church-people’s blogs, would not be part of the main blog.

Pete: Expression Engine by default uses HTML input, with some buttons (much like a forum) for formatting. There are plugins for textile etc.

 
Gravatar for Neil
Permlink
5 ·
Comment by
Neil ·
Date Stamp
Monday 1 August, 2005 at 07:09 AM

I hear what you are saying Scott – and you may well be right.

I think the difference at TAC is a comparitively high level of respect for and interest in the church web site, and a relatively high level of ‘geekness’ in SNC.

Those things might be enough to carry it.

In other words, you probably need people involved in ministry and who are enthusiastic about the ministry of the web site. I think that gives you your motivation.

 
Gravatar for Simon
Permlink
6 ·
Comment by
Simon ·
Date Stamp
Monday 1 August, 2005 at 10:16 AM

Scott, thanks for your insight.

Two things:

I think the Content Editors, rather than the webmaster, can encourage/prod people to keep their section up-to-date, particularly when they notice something has changed (a notice in the weekly bulletin is a good prompt – most people seem to remember the notice for the weekly bulletin, no matter how mundane). Further, it will be the Content Editors editing the site, not the sub-editors. The sub-editors may well submit updates on paper (although I’m sure the content editors will prefer email).

As you mentioned, it will also be about ownership. Not so much owning a web page, but ownership of a ministry/activity – of which the web-site is a method of communication. Hopefully with the focus on mission, people are starting to understand that they do own the ministries they are involved with.

In the end, I won’t feel obligated to keep information that is out-of-date… beware the delete key smile

 
Gravatar for Jon
Permlink
7 ·
Comment by
Jon ·
Date Stamp
Sunday 14 August, 2005 at 11:40 AM

Hello everyone. I’ve only just caught onto the discussions about the web site (sorry Simon). I think that getting more people involved in the content is a great idea and I certainly would support it from the Children’s Ministry point of view. We are looking to publish our program at the beginning of each term and it would be great to be able put things like this on the web, without bothering the webmaster each time. Lots of kids have web access now so we could make it a cool part of the ministry.

I understand the point about getting people to manage content, but also would argue that it’s a good tool to have available for those that want to use it. Maybe some areas have static content maintained by the webmaster and others are maintained by the ministry owners.

 
Gravatar for Simon
Permlink
8 ·
Comment by
Simon ·
Date Stamp
Monday 15 August, 2005 at 09:42 AM

Jon, thanks for your comments.

Your on the list (well.. when I create it you are) against Children’s Ministry.

“bothering the webmaster”… actually it’s no bother at all. I would actually be excited if someone sent me an update to a part of the site.

If you’re willing to edit the site directly, that’s even better. The new site will allow me to easily give people permission to edit certain parts of the site.

For Children’s Ministry, the current page is fairly basic, but could include a download link for the program. A special “sub-site” like the out-of-date Youth site is also possible.

 
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.
 

Menu

About

A personal blog by Simon Job.

From MathsClass

My blog about maths teaching.

Locker Problem

I recently used the “Locker Problem” in a Year 7 Maths Enrichment class (mixed ability). Here are some resources I used:
read more…

Subscribe

by RSS or Email

Follow

on Twitter

 

© 2005-2012 Simon Job · Use and recommend: ExpressionEngine, DreamHost
The posts and comments I make on this blog are made in a private capacity and do not represent the official view of my employer.