blog

TACWeb Redesign Part 2 - Audience

Comments (6) · 15 June 2005 · permalink

Post this to: del.icio.us · Twitter · email

Categories: Church Web Sites, TACWeb,

The new web-site obviously needs to be useful to a number of audiences.

Continuing discussion/reflection on the Toongabbie Anglican Church web-site… part 1 is here

Current Audience

The way the site is built will really depend on what audience(s) we are trying to meet. I think we have three different audiences, and below I explain how I think we are currently providing for those audiences (intentionally or not).

Members

Our church community is probably the most regular, although not necessarily the largest, audience of the current web-site. The site (and associated technologies – think email lists) have contributed to the life and administration of our church.

Some of the ways the current site has targetted members are:

  1. Opinionated (which I think can now be declared closed) – you can read about the focus of Opinionated.
  2. The Online Features was an attempt to get members regularly visiting the site, and being directed to other good stuff on the web. I’ve never really known if people have used or found helpful the Online Features.
  3. The calendar seemed like a natural inclusion for members, but I don’t think anyone uses it.
  4. Resources:
  5. The Mission Blog certainly has a purpose, but probably poor implementation

Local community

A church not looking outwards is just a bunch of people, not a church. TAC has its moments when it comes to community evangelism. We have some staple activities like scripture, some focussed activities like LifeWorks and a key annual event, Christmas. In 2004 we even had a follow-up web-site from the Christmas Impossible series.

Currently our site will tell a visitor about us as a church (allbeit with jargon) and to some extent explains our beliefs, but does neither very well.

World-wide visitors

Non-Christians will stumble across our site, because Google suggests we have something of interest to them. Some good examples: ““elephants wallpaper”:http://www.google.com/search?q=elephants+wallpaper&hl=en&lr=&start=60&sa=N”, “brainwashing drug” and “hueys cooking”.

Christians will find us (and stay with us) for our Sermons Online.

Future audience

For the future, I think the audience/content focus should basically be:

Local community

To quickly “meet” our church, and get a feel for who we are and what we do. I don’t think we need to go into extensive detail of our ministries, but we should present a brief picture of our meetings (people and content) and activities of our church that are specifically for bringing. I don’t think our site should have extensive evangelistic content, but there should be a jargon-free and simple explanation of Christianity.

The front page should be mainly focussed on visitors, but should include regularly updated content to show that we are an active community.

Members

For the rest of the site, the content should be purposeful. So, the site would move away from the brochure style we have at the moment, where there is a page for everything. Rather, I suspect the content will boil down to two streams: 1. sermons and 2. a “blog” of engaging and thought provoking content – well categorised and searchable.

From an administration point of view, there have been some functionality ideas expressed that would come under a Phase II.

World-wide visitors

No particular focus.

Your thoughts

So, what are your thoughts? Are the local community and members the two key audiences to focus on? Should the local community focus be more than an initial engagement? Are the members looking for engaging content or an information portal? (And feel free to disagree with my viewpoint above)

Gravatar for Jeff Wilkinson
Permlink
1 ·
Comment by
Jeff Wilkinson ·
Date Stamp
Thursday 16 June, 2005 at 08:43 AM

Have you asked anyone from these groups how they use the site now or what they’d like to see? Or are you speculating/guessing?

I’m certainly not criticizing either way. It’s really hard to get good feedback on a site, particularly the kind that can help you make real design decisions on the focus of your site going forward.

 
Gravatar for Simon
Permlink
2 ·
Comment by
Simon ·
Date Stamp
Thursday 16 June, 2005 at 09:35 AM

Hi Jeff,

Well, the point of this post is to get feedback from members of our church and hopefully they can shed light on how they’ve heard of the local community using the site.

So, yes, my comments are made on somewhat informed knowledge, but hoping to get a feel from other church members and the wide world like yourself.

 
Gravatar for Neil
Permlink
3 ·
Comment by
Neil ·
Date Stamp
Thursday 16 June, 2005 at 12:27 PM

I love the ideas you’ve mentioned under Future Audience!

It would be excellent to move beyond the brochure site that most church web sites have, and into something more interactive and engaging for both members and the wider community.

One battle we have to fight though, is that most members of TAC do not see the web site as being of great significance. There is a lot of old thinking to combat…

 
Gravatar for Phone
Permlink
4 ·
Comment by
Phone ·
Date Stamp
Friday 17 June, 2005 at 11:57 AM

Hi Simon.

I think you have some good ideas, particularly regarding separating the “purposeful” sections of the website with the other sections which are designed to be more of an introduction to us and to christianity (which i guess is purposeful in a different way).

Some sections which you have bad mouthed are actually useful – I’ve used the calendar and use the rss feed to the online features, some of which I have kept (such as the links to other sermons online)

Probably the biggest let down was the use of the blogs, but I think there isn’t really a big blog culture in our church – pete, ben, jane, dave G and yourself are really the only one who both wrote and read blogs, and even that was probably because it was seen as their ‘ministry’.

I think you are right in identifying the way we present ourselves and christianity as being one of the weaker parts of the website – all I can remember is that we are an evangical church in the sydney anglican tradition, who have an online form for organising to have their babies baptised. Not a helpful description for anyone outside of the sydney anglican tradition, and not a great message about baptism either… There are some good links to christianity.net and the testimonies by ben and jenny are great. I’m not sure how to use the website as a ‘bringing’ tool, but I’m not sure ‘more content’ is the answer, particularly as there are some great websites out there (although they tend to get lost in the sea of terrible ones).

Not much helpful here, just some rambling thoughts…

 
Gravatar for Simon
Permlink
5 ·
Comment by
Simon ·
Date Stamp
Sunday 21 August, 2005 at 02:36 AM

Luke, I agree about some education – in general about what is available on the Church web-site, and how to make the best use of it (e.g. RSS).

 
Gravatar for Luke
Permlink
6 ·
Comment by
Luke ·
Date Stamp
Sunday 21 August, 2005 at 10:54 AM

I have used the online bible many times and introduced many christians particularly from my work (Anglicare) who are unaware of the usefulness of such things, i would make the suggestion though if there are plain english versions e.g. level 27, good news etc, etc it might be worthwhile to provide links to those sights as well. In reference to the blogging my suggestion is that we need to do some education for the church around rss feeds because it is just to time consuming to manually look at the blogs then post a reply.

 
Commenting is not available in this channel entry.
 

Menu

About

A personal blog by Simon Job.

From MathsClass

My blog about maths teaching.

Locker Problem

I recently used the “Locker Problem” in a Year 7 Maths Enrichment class (mixed ability). Here are some resources I used:
read more…

Subscribe

by RSS or Email

Follow

on Twitter

 

© 2005-2012 Simon Job · Use and recommend: ExpressionEngine, DreamHost
The posts and comments I make on this blog are made in a private capacity and do not represent the official view of my employer.